Knowledge and Competitive Advantage（ISBN=9780521684156） chm umd 阿里云 下载 夸克云 pdf azw3 kindle

A comparison of the development of the synthetic dye industry in

Great Britain, Germany, and the US. The rise of this industry

constitutes an important chapter in business, economic, and

technological history because synthetic dyes - invented in 1857

-represent the first time that a scientific discovery quickly gave

rise to a new industry. British firms led the industry for the next

eight years, but German firms came to dominate the industry for

decades before WWI, while American firms played only a minor role

during the entire period. This study identifies differences in

educational institutions and patent laws as the key reasons for

German leadership in this industry. Successful firms had strong

ties to the centers of organic chemistry knowledge. The book also

argues that a complex coevolutionary process linking firms,

technology and national institutions resulted in very different

degrees of industrial success for dye firms in the three

countries.

1. Introduction

2. Country-level performance differences and their institutional

foundations

3. Three times two case studies of individual firms

4. The coevolution of national industries and institutions

5. Toward an institutional theory of competitive advantage

Appendices

Bibliography

暂无相关内容，正在全力查找中

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关书籍摘录，正在全力查找中！

在线阅读地址：Knowledge and Competitive Advantage（ISBN=9780521684156）在线阅读

在线听书地址：Knowledge and Competitive Advantage（ISBN=9780521684156）在线收听

在线购买地址：Knowledge and Competitive Advantage（ISBN=9780521684156）在线购买

暂无原文赏析，正在全力查找中！

书籍介绍

A comparison of the development of the synthetic dye industry in Great Britain, Germany, and the US. The rise of this industry constitutes an important chapter in business, economic, and technological history because synthetic dyes - invented in 1857 -represent the first time that a scientific discovery quickly gave rise to a new industry. British firms led the industry for the next eight years, but German firms came to dominate the industry for decades before WWI, while American firms played only a minor role during the entire period. This study identifies differences in educational institutions and patent laws as the key reasons for German leadership in this industry. Successful firms had strong ties to the centers of organic chemistry knowledge. The book also argues that a complex coevolutionary process linking firms, technology and national institutions resulted in very different degrees of industrial success for dye firms in the three countries.